Dr. Janos Drabik
100 YEARS OF TRIANON
Script of a documentary movie
Link on Issuu (for mobile devices; not downloadable; format: .pdf).
Link on the Box (for all mobile and desktop devices; downloadables; formats: .mobi, .epub, .pdf, .docx)
Link on Scribd (for desktop devices; downloadable; format: .pdf, .docx)
Contents of the movie:
Part 1: Who are really responsible for the starting of the Great War? How does the
Secret Elite Over the States prepare the war in the West?
Part 2: How does the power elite over the states prepare the Great War by
establishing the alliance of Great Britain and Russia?
Part 3: What role did the international freemasonry play in the continuation of the Great War and the disintegration of the Austro–Hungarian Monarchy?
Part 4: Who overthrew the historical Hungarian state in 1918?
Part 5: The consequences of the Trianon Peace Dictate: A mutilated country and the Trianon Psychosis, affecting also the successor states even today
Part 6: The Trianon of the whole Europe is in progress in our days
Full Document Below
Who are really responsible for the starting of the Great War? How does the Secret Elite Over the States prepare the war in the West?
The power over the states that prepared and blew out the Great War was strengthened within the British Empire, in order to create the new world order which it envisioned. In 1891, the secret society which was formed by the merger of the historical English ruling class and the money aristocracy controlling the crown colonies, sets the goal in London to take over the control over the financial, economic and political system of the world.
This secret organization over the British Parliament and the British government would have been unknown if American historian Carroll Quigley had not revealed the facts about its formation. Quigley was considered to be a trusted man of the power over the states, and, therefore, he was enabled to make research also in secret private archives. The American historian revealed that it was Cecil Rhodes who founded and funded that selected group, whose task was to secretly control the colonial policy and foreign policy strategy of the British Empire. The secret society involved new members from time to time, not all of whom were completely clear of the long-term goals of the secret group. The basic principle of their operation was based on confidentiality, secrecy and the understanding that actual power is significantly more important than the appearance of power.
In the first years of operation of the secret society, Cecil Rhodes, William Stead, Lord Esher, Alfred Milner and Lord Nathaniel Rothschild were the dominant persons. From the outset, the Prince of Wales, the later British sovereign Edward VII, played a key guiding role. From the very beginning, the secret elite that could be considered the informal government of the power over states, sought to revive and tighten the relationship between the British World Empire and the United States of America, seceded from it. The consolidation of this relationship constituted one of the most important parts of its world strategy.
At this time, the Rothschild bank house has already been operating an international financial network with regional centres in London, Paris, Frankfurt, Vienna and Naples. The Rothschild dynasty directed the financial and economic realm from the background, and few knew how much wealth was controlled by them. From the beginning, Lord Nathaniel Rothschild took part in Cecil Rhodes’ business and also in the secret society he founded. The leader of this government over the states became Alfred Milner, who proved to be best suited for the implementation of the strategy to create the new world order. Owing to the generous support of the House of Rothschild, Cecil Rhodes gained enormous wealth by acquiring the gold and diamond mines of South Africa. Rhodes and others organized an invasion of the new state of the boars, Transvaal. Alfred Milner then took over the position of governor of Cape Province, which became a British colony. Milner proved to be a successful colonizer, but his reputation was damaged by two serious problems. One was to accept the introduction of the concentration camp system and thus contributed to the killing of thirty thousand innocent women and children. Another circumstance, which severely damaged his prestige, was that the Chinese workers imported into the mines were being ruthlessly exploited and regularly whipped. In 1905, Milner returned from South Africa by previously putting his own people in every key position. The secret elite of London called him back to Europe because the preparation of the Great War to defeat Germany had accelerated.
The financial power of the City of London and the secret elite it created have considered Germany, which has successfully evolved within the system of productive capitalism, a direct threat. In the meantime, the money aristocracy operating within the British Empire has switched from productive capitalism to the system of money capitalism because it has been able to provide more income for itself. The economically, industrially and commercially dynamically developing Germany proved to be a competitor who could be defeated only through war.
However, Great Britain alone could not fight a successful war against Germany, for this it needed such military allies who detained also a sufficient number of land armies. The London secret elite learned from the Boer War that he must firmly keep in hand the direction of foreign policy regardless of what party is in power. It also knew that it had to reorganize the British Army totally, from its foundations, and to modernize its armament, so it is not enough to develop the navy.
They considered it necessary to re-tune the public opinion and to make it anti-German. The secret elite was forced to turn to Britain’s former enemies to find allies against Germany. In particular, they had to set up France and Russia on their side. This important task was largely undertaken by the British sovereign Edward VII. Queen Victoria, who reigned for 64 years, died in 1901, and at that time the Prince of Wales, known as a Francophile, under the reigning name of Edward VII, came to the throne.King Edward travelled almost all over Europe to enforce the secret elite’s long-term plan. Representing the informal government in London, he was the founder of the Entente Cordiale, the heartful consensus, the very good relationship, in 1904. From the report of Belgian diplomats, we know that Edward VII has successfully undermined Germany as the actual Foreign Minister of the informal government of London. Of course, it was not well known that he was doing this as the representative of the secret government of the power over the states.
Another member of the secret government, Lord Esher, was commissioned to draw lessons from the failures of the British Army in South Africa. He also played an important role in the fact that Edward VII has provided all the support for the modernization of the British Army. Lord Esher was also a member of the committee which mediated between the informal secret government and the formal British government. It was called the Imperial Defense Committee. Lord Esher, who was himself a member of this powerful committee, guaranteed that the modernization of the army and the management of foreign policy would be controlled by the secret elite. The agreement called Anglo–French cordial consensus confirmed that Egypt would be under British control and that the interests of France would prevail in Morocco. This was accepted by the German government until January 1905. The secret elite of London knew that if Germany knew the clauses of the agreement, it would act to defend its legitimate interests in Morocco.
However, Germany initiated the convening of an international conference to resolve the conflict. The London secret elite and the Paris political group, which was interested in regaining Alsace-Lorraine, had now already taken into account the outbreak of the war. French Foreign Minister Delcassé was promoted by Edward VII and the secret elite. However, the French Parliament rejected the war intentions of the extremely revanchist Delcassé and forced him to resign. The informal government of the power over the states has learned from this that if you want to be sure of France’s participation in the war against Germany, you will need to help such French politicians into government positions who are fully reliable.
How does the power elite over the states prepare the Great War by deepening the Franco-Russian alliance?
At the beginning of the 20th century, almost all powers were struck by the fact that in 1902 Great Britain entered into an alliance with Japan. London has provided all the help to its new allies to have a modern navy. To do this, Japan needed huge loans to develop its industry, and Britain assumed the construction of modern warships for Tokyo. The money power world elite grown big in the British World Empire, as in an incubator, was interested in the fact that the Tsarist Russia would not continue to expand to the south in the direction of Manchuria and China, at the Himalayas to India and in the Middle East to Persia. The informal government of the power over the states encouraged Japan to attack Russia. This war took place from 1904 to 1905, during which Japan dealt a decisive blow onto the Russian forces in the Far East. The secret government in London wanted to keep Russia away from the Far East and India, but its long-term goals also included winning it as an ally against Germany.
German Emperor William II, son of the sister of British sovereign Edward VII, was aware of this strategy. The German Emperor concluded a secret agreement in July 1905 with Russian czar Nicholas II in Björkö Sound, during a confidential meeting at sea. This could have upset the plan of the secret elite that was working to prepare the war. It therefore decided to take all his diplomatic, economic and political influences in order to prevent a Russian–German alliance. The German sovereign assessed the situation rightly when he claimed to the czar that Japan has been used by Great Britain to stop the Russian expansion in the east, and that London intended to turn also France against Germany.
The secret elite in London was aware that Russia had been seeking to reach out to the warm seas for centuries and promised to it Constantinople, Istanbul, the Bosphorus and the Dardanelles as a honeybee. An agreement was reached on Persia, but the essence of the whole was to build the British–French–Russian alliance to catch Germany in pincers. Edward VII neutralized the Björkö agreement by arranging that Alexander Izvolsky would be Russia’s foreign minister. From that moment onwards, Russia’s foreign affairs were controlled by the secret elite from London.
The main agent of the London secret elite was instructed to undermine the position of Prime Minister Joseph Caillaux and to replace the revanchist Raymond Poincaré, who was fanatically demanding back Alsace-Lorraine, and who was aware of how much he was indebted to Izvolsky and the foreign bankers behind him. The latter regularly provided large amounts of support and bribery money to the editors of the leading newspapers and to the French politicians already committed to the secret government of the power over the states operating in London.
Under the direction of Raymond Poincaré, the nature of the Franco–Russian alliance has changed substantially because both countries have committed themselves to the offensive war and were not limited only to defence. Poincaré also visited Sankt Petersburg to negotiate with the Foreign Minister Sergei Sazonov and assure him that both France and Britain are firmly committed to the war against Germany.
The Russian state has borrowed huge loans, 80% of which were given by the French banks. In 1914, Poincaré and the French masonic circles indebted to London behind him insisted that these loans be spent by Sankt Petersburg to the increase of the Russian army, the modernization of the railway network, because all these were needed for the mobilization of the Russian armed forces against Germany. The French banks and the central bank there were controlled by some super-rich money-oligarchs, including the Paris branch of the House of Rothschild. The number one centre of the Rothschild dynasty was in London, but the Rothschild interests in London and Paris cooperated most closely with each other, and they controlled the provision to Russia of loan transactions offered by other banks.
As Prime Minister of France, Raymond Poincaré was in a relatively vulnerable position because the current French constitution allowed for the relatively easy replacement of the Prime Minister. Therefore, to give a more solid political status to their own man, the London secret elite decided in 1913 to make Poincaré the President of France by the implementation of a large-scale bribery and corruption program. When Poincaré became President of the Republic, he immediately expanded the powers of the chief of state and carried out significant personal changes. He replaced the pacifist Ambassador in St. Petersburg Georges Louis, and appointed in his seat the similarly fanatically revanchist Théophile Delcassé. To the satisfaction of the controllers in London of the power over the states, Poincaré has taken measures to strengthen the French army.
How does the power elite over the states prepare the Great War with the gradual involvement of the United States?
Cecil Rhodes who, as the owner of the South African gold and diamond mines, has gained enormous political influence, has realized that the United States has a prominent importance in implementing the world strategy that would formally introduce the new world order dominated by the Anglo-Saxon species. This was the ultimate goal of the planned Great War. To promote this goal in America, Rhodes has created a scholarship that will be given to those who are dedicated to the new world order. Most of the Rhodes scholarships were distributed in the United States. At this time, in the United States, the layer of money aristocracy has already been established, which exercised the money power and the inherent political influence through a few super-rich industrialist financiers and oil tycoons.
The Pilgrims, whose ranks included the oldest and most prestigious notabilities of Great Britain and the United States, have played an important role in the preparation of the Great War since their formation, from 1902. Through this elite and private organization, the London secret elite enforced its interests and values and increased his influence throughout all parts of social and political life. The members of the secret elite occupied leadership positions in the organizations of the Pilgrims, but the documents of their private meetings and their super-secret consultations were destroyed.
The economic and financial power has more and more increasingly got in the hands of a small New York dynasty, among them the Houses of Morgan and Rockefeller were outstanding. We now know that the Rothschild dynasty controlled both the Houses of Morgan and Rockefeller. A prominent role among the New York bankers was played by Jacob Schiff and Paul Warburg, who were directly under the control of the London headquarters of the House of Rothschild. The new ruling elite created by the merger of the historic landowner aristocracy and the newly created money aristocracy, persuaded, with the help of his financial power, the politicians of the United States and of several European countries that they needed a central bank. With the help of the central bank, they were able to draw under control the financial system of the given country and to extend, with its help, their influence to control the political system.
In 1907, a banking crisis was created, so that the money oligarchy could demonstrate: only a monetary system operating under the direction of a central bank can ensure the stability of money and credit. The politician, bought by the money-power elite in the United States, was Senator Nelson Aldrich. He carried out on December 23, 1913 that the Congress of the United States approved , after about 100 years of fight, the establishment of a central bank. Senator Aldrich was able to accomplish this only with the help of the Morgan and Rockefeller bankers and the Society of Pilgrims. Their previous attempt to create such a bank failed with President William Howard Taft’s opposition. Therefore, the general staff of the power over the states decided to replace Taft with Woodrow Wilson, who was fully obedient to him. As a new Democrat president, he was the one who signed the Federal Reserve System Act in December 1913, which transferred in private hand the control over the issuance of money and the banking system, belonging to the sovereignty of the American state.
How does the power elite over the states prepare the Great War by establishing the alliance of Great Britain and Russia?
In 1912, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Sazonov met with British sovereign George V and British foreign Minister Sir Edward Grey in the Balmoral Castle, Scotland. Contrary to the truth, both Szazonov and Grey stated that the situation in the Balkan peninsula was not discussed. Even today, lies and disinformation still characterize our official knowledge about the four-day meeting. The secret government of the power over the states has now done its utmost to ensure that no information about its plans approaching the end should not be leaked.
Sazonov reported to the Czar that Great Britain was secretly committed to supporting France if it were to enter in war with Germany. The London government is ready to deploy both land and sea forces.
England, also secretly, has strongly supported the Balkan League. In the beginning of the 1900-ies, there were turbulent conditions in the whole region of the Balkan peninsula. The partisan war developed in Macedonia was followed by the revolution of the Young Turks, and then by the prolonged Bosnian crisis. The outbreak of the Italian–Turkish war in 1911 further weakened the Ottoman Turkish Empire and encouraged the new states interested in the acquisition of new territories in the Balkan peninsula. Under Russian influence, Serbia and Bulgaria entered into a federation, which initially – in March 1912 – was directed against the Austro–Hungarian Monarchy. This agreement also had a secret clause confirming that the alliance was directed against the Turkish Empire. Serbia then entered into an alliance with Montenegro and Bulgaria with Greece. The Balkan League was successful in the First Balkan War, which broke out in October 1912, following which the European territories of the Ottoman Empire got under the control of the new states. The unresolved conflicts among the allies have been sharpened again, especially in the case of Macedonia. As a result, the Balkan League broke up. Shortly, on 16 June, 1913, Bulgaria launched an attack against its former allies and the Second Balkan War began.
At that time, the Great War did not start, because the German Emperor did not want to do so and urged the convening of a peace conference in London. The secret elite in London had a blind eye to the brutal mass murders of Serbian troops. Also Austria–Hungary was under constant pressure from Serbia. The Serbs attacked very roughly also Albania, but Germany refused that his ally should be involved in the war because of Serbia. Again, it depended on the anti-war attitude William II that the Great War did not break out. Even at this time, the German Emperor also preferred diplomatic solutions. Austria was in a fervor of revolt because of the provocations suffered from Serbia and approached the limit of her patience. At that time, it was already possible to see that the Austro–Hungarian Monarchy would be the power to be used by the London secret elite to start the Great War.
How does the power elite over the states prepare the Great War by manipulating the Austro–Hungarian Monarchy?
The assassination of Crown Prince Franz Ferdinand was prepared and conducted by a well-organized network from Sarajevo to Belgrade and from Belgrade to Sankt Petersburg, from Sankt Petersburg to Paris and from Paris to London. Nicholas Hartwig and Leonid Artamonov collaborated closely with the Serbian nationalist Apis, i.e. Dragutin Dimitrijevic, and the secret organization Black Hand. From the Russian side, the plan for the assassination of the Austro–Hungarian heir to the throne was approved.
The Young Bosnians, a group consisting of substantially more idealist and more educated participants, also joined the preparation and execution of the planned assassination, with the collaboration of Apis. However, Apis wanted to give up the assassination in almost the last minute, because an international political conflict broke out in Belgrade between him and Prime Minister Pasic. This internal conflict in Serbia, however, was smoothed away by the Russians, primarily by Nicholas Hartwig, Ambassador to Belgrade, preventing the coup. The personal protection of the Prince heir to the throne was extremely loose on the day of the assassination and the cause of this is still the subject of controversy even today.
The attempt of suicide by swallowing cyanide of the arrested assailants failed. The complicity of the Serbian government was relatively easy to prove, despite those pieces of evidence that could have been linked the assassination either to Russia or to London were immediately made disappear. The Vienna government has broken diplomatic relations with Serbia and seized several documents that contained evidence of anti-Austrian activities. We can assert with almost total certainty that Nicholas Hartwig, Russian ambassador to Belgrade, was assassinated at the Austrian Embassy in Belgrade.
Apis, i.e. Dragutin Dimitrijevic, was executed based on fabricated accusations that were not related to the assassination in Sarajevo. Nicholas Hartwig’s correspondence with his superior, Foreign Minister Sergei Sazonov, mysteriously disappeared in 1917. Gavrilo Princip, who shot Franz Ferdinand, died in a prison of tuberculosis in 1918. The mentioned deaths were related to each other to the extent that all of them made it possible the hiding of those network connections and command chains that could have led back to Sankt Petersburg, Paris and London.
The secret general staff of the world power over the states of London ensured that the Sarajevo assassination grew to an overall international crisis. This was achieved, inter alia, by manipulating persons in decision-making positions in Vienna and Sankt Petersburg. The British and French diplomats operating in the two capitals, who were initiated in the top-secret strategy of the power over the states, also played an important role.
Initially, the European public opinion supported the Austro–Hungarian Monarchy, since it condemned the assassination of Crown Prince Franz Ferdinand. The general staff of the secret elite in London also demonstrated friendship and mutual understanding in the direction of Germany, deceiving the Berlin government, and unwillingly triggered the goodwill of many of the British Parliament’s representatives. This encouraged Leopold von Berchtold, the foreign minister of the Monarchy, to resolutely respond to the provocation and put an end to the aggression of Serbia.
Some of the mainstream historians argue that, with the intention of breaking out a major war, the German emperor was specifically encouraged to support Austria against Serbia. In fact, however, it was decided not in Berlin but in London what response should the Austrian–Hungarian Empire give to the Serbian aggression. The German emperor and his counsellors were thinking about local solutions, because they regarded the assassination against the heir to the throne a local problem and were not prepared to start the war.
The escalation of civil war conflicts in Ireland has caused a problem in London. The British Parliament and the legal London government have not been informed of the fact that there is a real risk of a major war to burst out due to the fierce opposition of the Austro–Hungarian Monarchy and Serbia.
Winston Churchill and Sir Edward Grey, who were trusted people of the secret government of the power over the states, used the sharpened international situation to buy the British–Persian oil company, thus ensuring the fuel supply to British warships and consolidate the British control in the Gulf region. Berchtold, the Foreign Minister of the Monarchy, gave priority to the diplomatic steps. He postponed the decision for three weeks, until Raymond Poincaré, who was then the President of France, had not returned from Russia. This time allowed politicians interested in the starting of the Great War to redefine their political goals and also to respond to the Vienna government by a diplomatic note. They dug the stack for Berchtold and trusted that the Berlin government would fall into the same trap.
At that time, the most critical decisions had to be taken in the center of the Tsarist Empire, Sankt Petersburg. The direct agents of the secret government over the states in London, the French Poincaré and the Russian Ambassador in Paris, Izvolsky, Ambassador of France to St. Petersburg, Maurice Paléologue, and British Ambassador Sir George Buchanan encouraged, competing with each other, Czar Nicholas and his Minister of Foreign Affairs Sergei Sazonov to behave hard against the Austro–Hungarian Monarchy.
In fact, Raymond Poincaré travelled to St. Petersburg, also as in 1912, with the same purpose: to make a promise to the Russian government that France enters the war on the side of Russia if Germany would stand beside the Monarchy. This can be called the “empty cheque” that historians have mentioned so often. Ambassador George Buchanan assured the Minister of Foreign Affairs Sir Edward Grey that the preparation of the Great War was progressing well and he was regularly in connection with Russian Foreign Minister Sazonov. The majority of the British population had no idea of the close relationship with Russia of a legal and the informal government above it.
The czarist system was antipathic to the majority of the British. If they had been asked, the majority of them would have refused to enter a military alliance with Russia. In the London Parliament and the formal British government, the information on the fast deterioration of the international situation was withheld until 24 July 1914. Germany was deeived by having different gestures to make him believe: the relationship with Britain was significantly improved, as a result of ongoing parliamentary, press and diplomatic debates. This was the appearance, while the general staff of the secret elite had already started the destruction of Germany. Again and again, the Foreign Minister of the Austro–Hungarian Monarchy was informed of the extent to which the international public opinion agreed that Austria must avenge the aggressive conduct of Serbia.
At the same time, the formulation of the joint reply of the British, French and Russian was secretly done, which rejected the Austrian note sent to the Government of Belgrade. The note formulated by Berchtold claimed reasonable demands. However, the response of the Entente states was disproportionately negative. The time-pulling of the Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Monarchy allowed the elaboration of the collective position for the Entente states preparing to start the war. The response of Serbia, inspired by the secret elite of London, seemed to be conciliatory, but it was prepared to replace the military response by the Monarchy.
Germany was worrying about the fact that the Austro-Hungarian Empire responded too slowly to Serbia. Emperor William II was in fact pleased that the Serbian response apparently averted the likelihood of the outbreak of a war. However, Belgrade’s response to the foreign minister of the Monarchy has yet proved to be a trap. On 25 July 1914, British Foreign Minister Sir Edward Grey already knew that Russia could be persuaded to assume the risk of a general war.
How does the power elite over the states manipulate the transmission of declarations of war to make the Central Powers, especially Germany, responsible for the Great War?
The first mobilizations were made by the Entente states. The generally accepted position was that the first step in the outbreak of an armed war, in the case of a great power, is the ordering of the general mobilization. According to the plans of the secret government in London, France and Russia had to break out the war in such a way that Germany should face a two-front attack, both from the east and west. This plan of the secret elite was further concretized when President Poincaré and the French government agreed in principle to implement the mobilization together with the Russians, during the time when Poincaré was in Sankt Petersburg. Poincaré reassured again and again the Czar and Sazonov of France’s rock-solid war commitment.
The Czar had a good reason to hesitate. However, his Minister of Foreign Affairs, who was a high-ranking Grand Orient Mason, received numerous encouragements from a similarly-minded French Ambassador, Maurice Paléologue, and George Buchanan, the British Ambassador. They were both high-ranking Masons. The Russian military leadership ordered the general mobilization and was satisfied with the fact that the French allies promised and did the same.
In the last minute, Tsar Nicholas II ordered Sazonov to stop the mobilization. There is also evidence that, through his personal agent, he also wanted to inform German Emperor William II. The delegate was arrested without the Czar’s knowledge, and Sazonov instructed the competent general of the Russian army to continue the mobilization.
In London, Minister of Foreign Affairs Sir Edward Grey was also advocating the mobilization, arguing that it was inevitable. Buchanan warned Sazonov in Sankt Petersburg to ensure that the Germans should not know that the general mobilization is in progress. Buchanan and Grey were aware that the British public opinion would not be willing to undertake the war unless there was fully certain that Germany was actually the attacking party, the aggressor provable with evidences.
In Belgrade, on 25 July 1914, at 3 p.m. the Serbian government also ordered the general mobilization. Subsequently, a limited, partial mobilization was made against Serbia at 9.30 p.m. the Monarchy.
The mobilization of the Russian army was ordered when the French president was still in Sankt Petersburg. The diplomats of the Entente powers in Sankt Petersburg observed and recorded all the details of the mobilization of the Russian army. Czar Nicholas II approved the partial mobilization of the Russian army on 26 July 1914.
Starting from 25 July 1914, the diplomatic efforts of the British foreign minister were directed to give time to the secret mobilization of the large Russian armed forces. In the 5 days between 25–30 July, all his efforts were made to serve this purpose. Grey was in a friendly relationship with Prince Karl Max Lichnowsky, the Ambassador of Germany to London, whom he consciously deceived by asserting that it is totally unlikely that Britain would play a greater role in a future Great War. The secret elite in London laid great emphasis on maintaining the appearance of a normal relationship, while secretly making every conceivable preparation in order to break out the Great War.
British sovereign George V has done everything to deceive his cousin (through the mother of William II, who was the sister of Edward VII), the German Emperor that Britain would definitely remain neutral when a war would blow out. This deceiving of the emperor was supported by the British Ministry of Foreign Affairs with the disinformation that Germany had secretly already mobilized and is much better prepared for a Great War than Russia and France. Foreign Minister Edward Grey also simulated that he continuously maintained relationship through telegraph with diplomatic bodies. In fact, these telegrams were never sent. All this play was necessary so that the British society, which had to bear the burden of war, would believe that his Parliament and his Government had done everything to avoid the war.
Germany fell into the trap because it believed that Britain would remain neutral and thought that the war would be confined to Austria and Serbia, despite of being already aware that Russia was in the process of mobilizing the army.
Theobald von Bethmann-Hollweg and William II was upset by the delay of Leopold von Berchtold, Minister of Foreign Affairs, and of the Austrian government. Vienna did not respond to Berlin’s request to hold direct talks with the Russian leadership. The Tsar envisaged the suspending of the general and complete mobilization, in response to the requests arrived from the German Emperor to prevent a war. However, Foreign Minister Sergei Sazonov and the leadership of the army convinced Nicholas II that the suspension or postponement of the mobilization cannot be a factor any more.
In Berlin, Bethmann-Hollweg was looking for a way out of the tension in order to maintain peace. In conjunction with Berchtold, he attempted to prevent the outbreak of the war. However, this option was also lost, when also Russia publicly ordered full and general mobilization on 30 July 1914.
What role did the international freemasonry play in the continuation of the Great War and the disintegration of the Austro–Hungarian Monarchy?
In January 1917, the French National Grand Lodge (Grand Loge de France) held an international conference with the participation of the delegates of several European Masonic lodges. This discussed the creation of the League of Nations.
The other grand lodge of France is the Grand Orient of France (Grand Orient de France). An important conference was held also in April 1917, when the most important international issues were discussed in an all-state Masonic deliberation. At that time, on the proposal of the London secret elite, it was decided to establish a strong anti-monarchy movement in Germany.
From the perspective of the historical Hungarian state, these three conferences of the international Masonic leadership in Paris has proved to be decisive. The Supreme leaders of freemasonry did not exchange views on the usual Masonic themes, but on the circumstances of the conclusion of the World War and on the new European borders after the war. The preparation of the peace treaties began, the General Staff of Freemasonry designated the future boundaries of each state, agreed on the territories allocated to the winners and the amounts of reparations. They also discussed the creation of the planned League of Nations.
Preliminary decisions concerning the breaking up of the one thousand year old Hungarian Kingdom were also made in 1917. André Tardieu played a leading role in the drafting of the Treaty of Trianon, who was publishing in the Le Temps at that time. In his articles he provided information about the mentioned Masonic deliberations. For Hungary, the top leaders of international freemasonry have approved decisions that were later literally included into the Versailles peace dictate.
These Masonic documents have taken into account the agreements adopted by the Entente governments in the former secret negotiations. In 1916, Transylvania and Eastern Hungary to the line of the river Tisza was promised to Romania, which, at that time, declared war on the Austro–Hungarian Monarchy, formerly considered an ally. The initial success of the Brusilov offensive, in August 1916 led Bucharest to enter the war on the side of the Entente and to compensate for his lost eastern territories with Transylvanian territories. This Romanian attack, however, was successfully reversed by the Monarchy, primarily by the Hungarian armed forces, with German assistance. Russia left the war after the Bolshevik takeover, and thus Romania was isolated and forced to sue for peace. Its territory was under the occupation of the Central Powers until 1918.
After 1867, the Czech Republic, which was part of the Monarchy, wanted to have a status similar to the Hungarian Kingdom. The Czech leaders were dissatisfied with Vienna’s policy of nationalities, and the Masons, the formally non-member Tomáš Masaryk and the lodge-member Eduard Beneš, from the beginning of the outbreak of the World War, were lobbying for the fragmentation of the Monarchy at the Masonic leaders of the western countries. At the offer of the London secret elite, the leading circles of the Great Entente first wanted to create a multinational confederation from the Habsburg Monarchy. Eduard Beneš managed to persuade the senior Masonic leadership that not Hungary should be the Masonic pattern state in Eastern Europe, but the Czech Republic.
On 28 May 1916, a secret Masonic conference was held in Geneva at which a decision was taken against the peace initiative of Pope Benedict XV. An international Masonic Congress took place also in Rome in December 1916. The Masonic leader Riccardi stated here that the war would continue until Serbia and Belgium regained their autonomy, and Alsace-Lorraine was returned to France. An important international Masonic conference was also held in 1917 in Stockholm. Here, a Social Democrat Peace Congress was held, the expenditures of which were covered by the freemasons. At this meeting, such freemasons were the tone-setters as Viktor Adler, Branting and Vandervelde. The German Mason Scheidemann was also present, who was a spokesman for the Entente freemasonry and received the instructions from Paris.
The delegates of all states, with the exception of the Germans, were present on the Masonic Congress held in Paris at the end of June 1917. The reattachment of the Alsace-Lorraine to France, the restoration of the independent Poland and the creation of a whole new state of Czechoslovakia covering the Czech and Slovak speaking areas were decided here. The top leaders of the international freemasonry agreed here to dissolve the Austro–Hungarian Monarchy and create independent successor states.. One of their most important decisions was the creation of the League of Nations.
An important Masonic conference took place in late September 1918 too. A number of 300 delegates of the Grand Orient de France, the French Grand Orient Lodge, participated in it. This conference has already been attended by the delegation of the German Grand Lodge, the Grosse Landesloge von Deutschland. Duke of Connaught, the Grand Master of the British Freemasons was present. The French Grand Master, General Perin and the Portuguese Grand Master Magalhaes Lima were also present. Participants in the deliberations urged the formation of the League of Nations and stipulated that only states with Masonic governments could be members of this world organization.
On 3 October 1918, Germany made a ceasefire offer, which was signed on November 11 1918. However, the senior leadership of the international freemasonry was already absolutely certain in the victory in September. The Chancellor of Germany, Max von Baden, has forwarded the armistice offer, but the Masonic general staff immediately started counteracting. The American Masonic senators then called on the governments of the Entente states to stand in the way of the ceasefire to be signed with Germany.
In his speech delivered in 1961 in the Willard Hotel in Washington, D.C., Benjamin Freedman said that at the end of 1916, England should have accepted the German peace offer. The German submarine blockade proved to be successful. But then the German Zionists turned to the London War Cabinet and said: “Look here. You can yet win this war. You don’t have to give up. You don’t have to accept the negotiated peace offered to you now by Germany. You can win this war if the United States will come in as your ally. We will guarantee to bring the United States into the war as your ally, to fight with you on your side, if you will promise us Palestine after you win the war.”
On the instruction of the London secret elite, the formal British government accepted this offer and on 19 October 1916 agreed with the Zionists. A turnaround occurred then. The American Jewish money elite stood on the side of Germany in the war against Russia. However, when London promised Palestine to them, the sympathy with the Germans was replaced by German-hatred. The United States entered the war in 1917 and the agreement with the Zionists, known as the Balfour Declaration, was concluded. We quote another excerpt from Benjamin Freedman’s speech at the Willard Hotel in 1961: “Now, when the war was ended, and the Germans went to Paris, to the Paris Peace Conference in 1919, there were 117 Jews there, as a delegation representing the Jews, headed by Bernard Baruch.”
Freedman continues: “Now what happened? The Jews at that peace conference, when they were cutting up Germany and parceling out Europe to all these nations that claimed a right to a certain part of European territory, the Jews said: »How about Palestine for us?« And they produced, for the first time to the knowledge of the Germans, this Balfour Declaration. So the Germans, for the first time realized: »Oh, that was the game! That’s why the United States came into the war.« And the Germans, for the first time realized that they were defeated, they suffered this terrific reparation that was slapped onto them, because the Zionists wanted Palestine and they were determined to get it at any cost. When the Germans realized this, they naturally resented it. Up to that time, the Jews had never been better-off in any country in the world than they had been in Germany. Just think about Mr. Rathenau, who was maybe one hundred times as important in industry and finance as is Bernard Baruch in this country, about Mr. Balin, who owned the two big steamship lines, the North German Lloyd’s and the Hamburg–American Lines. Think about Mr. Bleichroder, who was the banker for the Hohenzollern family, about the Warburgs in Hamburg, who were the big merchant bankers – the biggest in the world. The Jews were doing very well in Germany. No question about that. Now, the Germans felt: »Well, that was quite a sellout.«”
The First World War was decided by America’s entering the war. The number one politician of the United States, President Woodrow Wilson came up with a program of general application. Wilson himself was not a Freemason, but the majority of his advisors was. On 8 January 1918 he drafted his famous Fourteen Points, which he also sent to the American Congress.
Wilson has set itself the objective of eliminating secret diplomacy, the assurance of the freedom of seas and trade, the reduction of armaments and the settlement of the colonial issue. His objectives included the emptying of the occupied Russian territory, the guarantee of the independence of Belgium, the reannexation of Alsace-Lorraine to France, the revision of Italy’s borders on the basis of the national principle, as well as the restoration of the independence of Romania, Serbia and Montenegro. Wilson called for the division of the Turkish Empire on the basis of the national principle, the free use of the sea straits, the restoration of the independent and unified Poland and the creation of the League of Nations.
The historical Hungarian state was touched by Point X. According to this, “The people of Austria–Hungary, whose place among the nations we wish to see safeguarded and assured, should be accorded the freest opportunity to autonomous development.” President Wilson left the question of the fate of the Monarchy open here. Essentially, he merely communicates that the Entente is satisfied with the transformation of the Monarchy into a federative state and does not intend to mutilate or divide its territory. It is apparent from the Fourteen Points of Wilson that the world-forming forces above the states wanted to transform this war, started for selfish imperialist goals, into an ideological war waged for noble purposes and principles. The slogan was “a great war so that there should never be a war anymore.” In fact, such a Great War started then, that is not over even today.
On 18 April 1918, the Congress of the oppressed nationalities of Central Europe was convened in Rome. The aim was to reconcile the Italian, Czech, Romanian and Southern Slavic interests. Italy considered the Habsburg Monarchy to be his enemy, but he feared that the Southern Slavic State planned to be created after the dissolution of the Monarchy would oppose the objectives of Italy. In the autumn of 1917, the Italian troops were defeated, and President Wilson did not recognize the Italian demands beyond ethnic unification, so Rome changed its foreign policy. On the mentioned conference, they stressed the common struggle against the Habsburg Monarchy, and the community of the Serbian, Croatian, Slovenian and Italian interests. From that moment on, Italy acted as a defender of small peoples and called for a full dismembering of the Habsburg Monarchy. This objective was supported by the Entente states.
In the dissolution of the Monarchy, the Czech Corps composed of the Czech-speaking prisoners of war played an important role in Siberia. The Bolsheviks now already in power agreed with Tomáš Masaryk to transport the Czech Corps through Vladivostok to the Western European theatre of war. In May 1918, the leaders of the Czech Corps took hold of the long line of the Trans-Siberian railway. At that time, the Czech Corps, composed of around 40 000 soldiers, gave an important aid to the Entente. Eduard Beneš, who openly admitted to be a Freemason, declared: “Not alone and not exclusively our Siberian intervention was that made our allies to acknowledgement us de jure.” Bohemia, being a part of the Habsburg Monarchy, wanted to make himself recognized as a fighting party, an Entente’s ally.
On 30 June 1918, France, on 9 August Great Britain and on 3 September the United States recognized the Czech Republic as an allied nation, to which the northern part of the Kingdom of Hungary, inhabited by the Slavic language-speaking people, was already added. From that time onwards, the Czech Legion was considered an Allied force.
The creation of the South Slavic state was prepared by the Convention concluded on the island of Corfu on 20 July 1917. On 2 March 1918, also the Slovenes joined to it. The Entente supported these steps, but the recognition of the South Slavic state was done only after the war was ended. The Entente acknowledged also Poland as an allied nation.
The disintegration of the Habsburg Monarchy also meant the end of the European balance policy. The successor states could no longer fill the balancing role which the Habsburg Monarchy had been occupied from 1915. On 4 October 1918, Germany and the Austro–Hungarian Monarchy agreed to the armistice, according to the conditions of the US President Wilson’s Fourteen Points. Charles IV, the sovereign of the Monarchy, who was then also crowned the King of Hungary, stated that, on the basis of the full equality of all nationalities, Austria will be reorganized on a federative basis. The Hungarian government has maintained the personal union. Prime Minister István Tisza acknowledged in the Hungarian National Assembly that the Kingdom of Hungary had lost the war as part of the Habsburg Monarchy.
On 12 December 1916, the Central Powers made a peace offer to the Entente, based on the status quo ante, i.e. to restore the pre-war situation. The secret decision-makers of the power over the states in London, whose instructions were followed by the international Freemasonry, rejected the Central Powers‘ peace offer.
On 10 January 1917, Masaryk and Beneš made all efforts so that the Entente should reject the peace initiatives of the Central Powers on the international conference of the French Masonic Grand Lodges and the subsequent Masonic discussions.
Notified about the developments, the Hungarian Government initiated a special peace offer to the United States at the beginning of 1917. However, the reply note to the diplomatic step made by István Tisza arrived, instead of Budapest, into the Austrian capital, where nobody knew nothing about István Tisza’s offer. Thereafter, the sovereign Charles IV, who still fulfilled the role of the chief of state, discharged István Tisza, and he himself made a special peace offer to the Entente. The essence of this was that the Monarchy offers his alliance to the Entente and breaks up with Germany.
At that time, the common Foreign Minister of the Monarchy was István Burián. Walking in the footsteps of István Tisza, he repeatedly recommended peace to Wilson, based on the principles proclaimed by the American President. This offer has been accepted. It was a Hungarian diplomat who established the bilateral agreement between the Austro–Hungarian Monarchy and the Entente states on 5 October 1918. At its meeting held on 6 October, the Supreme War Council of the Entente set as a condition that the Austro–Hungarian forces should evacuate the occupied alien areas. This claim did not affect Hungary’s territorial integrity. In the spirit of this preliminary peace, Charles IV acknowledged the self-determination of the peoples of Austria in his Declaration issued on 16 October 1918. With this, at the same time, also the compromise concluded between Austria and Hungary in 1867 also expired, and also the Kingdom of Hungary recovered its independence.
At this time, Tomáš Masaryk no longer wanted an independent Czech state, but his purpose was actually the creation a Czech empire. Therefore, on 18 October 1918, he visited President Wilson and persuaded him to unilaterally withdraw the agreement with Hungary. Masaryk even reached that the conditions of Wilson would be replaced by terms formulated by himself. Hungary and Austria fell the victim of the plot of one of the influential personalities of international Freemasonry (whose formal lodge membership is still being disputed).
Germany condemned all this. The new Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Monarchy, Gyula Andrássy, tried to save what could be saved. He did not break up the German alliance, and accepted the conditions of the American President Wilson only as a basis of negotiaton. On 3 November 1918, in the service time of the Minister of Foreign Affairs Gyula Andrássy, the Padova armistice treaty was concluded. This also left the territory of the Kingdom of Hungary intact. Due to the internal subversive demoralization committed by the radical intellectuals that followed all the shades of Freemasonry and Marxism in Hungary, the Czechs, Romanians and Serbs had to come up with territorial claims against a Hungary that had been paralyzed internally. In order to be able to disannex large areas of Hungary, avoiding the historical, ethnic and self-determination principles, they also needed the maximum ideological and political support of the Freemasonry in Hungary.
The background of the assassination of István Tisza cannot be understood without the international Freemasonry and the Masonic organizations of the successor states. The international Freemasons and their supporters in Hungary had to assassinate István Tisza because at that time he was the person representing the historical Hungarian state who could still have stopped the disarmament of the Hungarian army, and the destruction of the historical Hungarian state order. István Tisza was in touch with Raymond Poincara, Georges Clemenceau, Sidney Sonnino and Carlotti. If Stephen Tisza had not been murdered by the radical conspirators who had been incited by Freemasons, he could have used, during the peace consultations, all the secret letters that he exchanged with Entente politicians who gained an important role in Versailles. Pál Kéri-Krammer, József Pogány-Schwartz and their companions, belonging to the radical freemasons were only the executors. The removing of István Tisza from among the living persons cannot be understood without the operation of Masonic centers.
The specific plans for the division of the Austro–Hungarian Monarchy were developed by Tomáš Masaryk for the British Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Masaryk was a member of the Czech National Assembly as the representative of the Czech People’s Party. In particular, he called for a confederational transformation of the Habsburg Monarchy. After the outbreak of the Great War, he emigrated to Geneva and then to London. His pupil was Eduard Beneš and the Slovakian Milan Rastislav Štefanik. He created the Czechoslovak National Council with them. In 1917 he played an important role in organizing the Czech Legion of about 40-50 thousand people. In 1918 he travelled to the United States and convinced President Wilson about the possibility of establishing the independent Czech Republic and then the Czech Empire, named Czechoslovakia.
Masaryk originally selected a Russian prince as the head of the planned Czechoslovak Kingdom. Sub-Carpathia belonging to the Kingdom of Hungary, Romania and the South Slavic Kingdom would have got also in the Russian circle of interest. Masaryk intended the western region of Hungary to the Czechs and the Serbs. On the basis of Masaryk’s memorandum, the Entente powers rejected the Central Powers’ peace offers. The borders proposed by Masaryk were approved at the Paris Conference on 8 May 1919.
Perhaps the most important item of President Wilson’s Fourteen Points was the assurance of the national self-determination. This principle has been proclaimed by the international Freemasonry, but was never taken seriously if it has not served the goals of its universal strategy striving at world rule.
Eduard Beneš, the Masonic disciple of Masaryk, in 1908 wanted only to federalize and not to liquidate the Habsburg Monarchy. After the outbreak of the First World War, he organized a secret resistance movement. From the beginning, he kept close contact with Masaryk, who was living in Switzerland at that time. In September 1915, Beneš emigrated to Paris and lobbied for the creation of an independent Czechoslovak state at the Masonic leaders there. Masaryk introduced Beneš to Milan Rastislav Štefanik in Paris, who was also his student at the Charles University. As an astronomer, Štefanik was already known as a personality in the French intellectual sphere, and he himself had a strong relationship with the important members of the French political life.
Who overthrew the historical Hungarian state in 1918?
Following Turkey’s example, Hungary would have been able to resist the Trianon Peace Dictate, which denied the historical, ethnic and self-determination principles. The Hungarian army returning from the front, but not defeated, should have defended the Hungarian borders that had been left intact under the armistice of Padua. Instead, the Kingdom of Hungary, which was leaving the Monarchy, had in a very short time disarmed its own army of around 1,200,000 troops and left the Hungarian borders completely unprotected.
The radical groups representing all nuances of Marxism played a decisive role in committing this grave historical mistake, headed by the also quite radicalized Masonic lodges. At the end of the XIX century, the international Freemasonry strived at the breaking up of the Austro–Hungarian Monarchy, counted to be the support of the Vatican. The objective of the Masonic strategy was to incite Crown Prince Rudolf, the heir to the throne, against Franz Joseph, his father. Hungary would be removed from the monarchy and transformed into a separate Masonic kingdom. This plan failed because Crown Prince Rudolf committed suicide in Mayerling on 30 January 1889.
The government led by Mihály Károlyi was formed following a coup called the “aster revolution”. Previously, the paid agents of the radicals, aiming at the subversion of the historical Hungarian state, killed István Tisza, the Hungarian politician, who would have been obeyed by the soldiers returning from the front. The most important ministerial positions in the government of Mihály Károlyi were filled by members of the Masonic Lodge Martinovics, led by the chief master Oszkár Jászi-Jakubovits. They did the opposite of what Mustafa Kemal made in Turkey. The Hungarian Freemasons who came to power served obediently the decisions of the international freemasonry that determined the Parisian government’s eastern policy against the Monarchy.
Pál Kéri-Krammer, who, according to the observation of István Lendvai, was right the Bolshevism itself walking on two legs, in the Otthon (Home) Circle, the meeting place of the leftist journalists, on 31 October 1918, took out his watch at half past 4 and said, “István Tisza has only one and a half hour left.” The leaders of the Masonic takeover therefore knew what was being prepared against István Tisza. Mihály Károlyi, in his famous duel with István Tisza, was a humbled and defeated, when Tisza played with him and pressed him to the wall of the fencing hall, and then Károlyi swore to destroy Tisza, even if the whole of Hungary would be destroyed together with him. It is a historical fact that when Károlyi came to power, the true Hungarian István Tisza was killed on that day.
The Népszava, which was the newspaper of the Hungarian Social Democratic Party in 1918, published the following funeral article, bidding farewell to István Tisza, the epitome of the historical Hungarian state: “The tyrant of Geszt, one of the main sinners of the war, the depraver of Hungary, who had been avoided by the bullet of the people’s sentence until now, was killed by desperate revolutionaries on Thursday night. (…) He was the personification of the most evil and the most obstinate class rule, comparable to which it is now impossible to find anywhere in the whole Europe, he was the personification of the harsh brutality of government, such an outstanding representative of the Junkers’ arrogance provoking the masses and of the haughtiness of power similar to whom we would try to find in vain among the European statesmen of a whole generation. The cursing tears of a multitude of widowers and of orphans, which will accompany his memories, will surely weigh more in the balance of truth than the sorrow of the Hungarian accomplices who remained without leader.”
The power over the states and their agents in Hungary managed to seize the power through a coup. István Tisza was not alive, there was no functional National Assembly, but there was still a Hungarian Army, there were intact, untouched Hungarian regiments that could have protected the borders of the historical Hungarian state, so it was necessary to immediately disintegrate this Army.
The first period of the Great War, called the First World War, broken out by the money power over the states, was fought on the western front, on the territory of the Entente states. The war-struck France did not have the power to fight also on the eastern front and, therefore, it persuaded Romania to attack the Central Powers by promising it to receive all of Transylvania, the territories east of the river Tisza as well as the Eastern Hungarian territories called Partium and the Banat. The Masonic General Staff of Paris also did the same with the Czech Freemasons, also promising them the vast northern territories separated from the historical Hungarian state.
They did the same thing with the Serbs. In the Masonic centres in Paris, the territories of Hungary were used to pay the successor states for their services to the Entente. This required that Hungary should be weak and should not have enough force to regain its stolen territories. It was also intended that no such country should there be around the mutilated, remaining Hungary that would not have received Hungarian territories. This is how the ancient Hungarian territories were given to Austria.
If the undefeated Hungarian Army of 1,200,000 soldiers, returning from the front, was not disarmed with record speed, the territory of the historical Hungarian state could have been defended.
Béla Linder, who was the Minister of War of the Masonic government of Mihály Károlyi for 9 days, in his speech delivered on 2 November 1918, said: “The traditions of thousands of years, the servitude of thousands of years, the tyranny of thousands of years had to be ruined. This required a five-year war, thousands and a thousands of deaths so that a new victorious life should emerge from it. This new victorious life is born in the spirit of pacifism. No army is needed anymore! I never want to see a soldier anymore! Swear to the fact that your children will be brought up in such a spirit that the possibility of any war should be closed from now on. “
It is the deceptive reasoning of the compromising and servile pacifism. The Masonic radicals that came to power have clearly seen that the army must be disintegrated, also because it can not only protect St. Stephen’s state from its neighbours preparing for the territory robbing, but it is also necessary to break it up because if this army comes home, it can get even with the runners up of prices, the speculator war-millionaires, for them this army meant a life hazard. The effort to disintegrate the army was not started after the October coup, but much sooner. Already in January 1918, the barracks and the companies departing for the front have been flooded with anti-war leaflets. These were drafted by the so-called College Branch of Free Thinkers in Hungary and the members of the Galilei Circle.
Béla Linder, who does not want to see a soldier anymore, resigns after a few days of service as Minister of War. The alcoholic Béla Linder, who delivered the above quoted speech being dead drunk again, was replaced by Lieutenant Colonel Albert Bartha. As Minister of War Albert Bartha proved to be unsuitable to prevent the invading Romanians from conquering Transylvania. While the undefeated Hungarian army was dissolved in a few weeks, the Czechs, the Romanians and the Serbs were arming themselves at an accelerated pace with the support of the Entente. At the same time, Mihály Károlyi, who adhered to the politics of the servile pacifism, welcomed the enemy occupying Hungary as a friend, as the newspaper Az Est wrote.
A republic already existed, but it grew smaller every day. Freedom and democracy are only defending the winners of the war. The Czech Legion pushes forward from the north, the Serbian Army from the south, and Romania already ordered a full mobilization.
This is what Sándor Nádas-Neumann writes in the newspaper Az Est when Hungary is fighting a life-and-death struggle: “I cannot understand the officers, the active ones, and the reservists. They hold all sorts of meetings, ask for their swords to be given back, and do not want to take off their uniforms. I admit, I thought that once here they will tell the word: peace, and another one: armistice, and the third: disarmament, and then everyone here starts to run home like a fool. (…) I thought so. However, since the peace has arrived, everyone is crying, hopeless and pessimistic. But I am not in despair. What calamity comes now, Wilson does not know about, he cannot know, this is done by the Czechs and the Slovaks themselves. The Entente does not know about this, and even if knows something, he does not know it well, and especially it does not believe that it is true. This will not stay that way, and you don’t have to be pessimistic, because Wilson did nothing yet, and he didn’t say anything about which you could conclude that he does not insist on his 14 points.”
It would have been possible to keep Transylvania if the forces deciding to overthrow the historical order of Hungary had not resisted it. Such an opportunity was what the Field Marshal August von Mackensen, who was defending three times the borders of Hungary, offered to Károlyi. By virtue of the valid armistice agreements, Mackensen had started back to Germany from the previously defeated Romania together with his army. The former heroic defender of the Hungarian borders, the general of triumphant battles, decided be the last to leave Hungary, returning to his country following his retreating troops. He arrived by train to the Józsefváros railway station in Budapest, at the invitation of the Károlyi government, being under the influence of radical Masons. Here he was welcomed by the soldiers of the Budapest Military Council led by József Pogány-Schwartz.
On behalf of the Ministry of War, Major Gerő asked Mackensen if he was willing to go to the Prime Minister voluntarily. The field marshal obeyed to be the prospect of violence, and after the removal of the cinematographer, he got out of the train. József Pogány-Schwartz smiled with delight in mischief when the German general got into the car that took him to the Parliament. During the short meeting, only Mihály Károlyi, Vilmos Böhm and August von Mackensen stayed in the room. The German officers in his escort entered the room only when Mackensen indignantly called to account for the ungratefulness of Hungary. Károlyi sat pale in an armchair, and Vilmos Böhm kept explaining that they were only meeting the provisions of the Allied mission.
Already in Nagyvárad, Mackensen got a promise from the representatives of the Hungarian Government to await the return home of the last German soldier at the Esterházy Castle in Pápa. Károlyi has also considered that the field marshal would be able to depart from Hungary more easily from this place. Yet he chose Fót for his place to stay because he took into consideration the instructions of the Entente. Following the departure of Mackensen, Major Gerő told Captain Henrik Reisner to continue as a liaison officer besides Mackensen, who would be interned in Fót. Reisner received a company to perform his task. After asking for information from Captain Reisner, Mackensen was indignant at the company ordered to his guard, but accepted the captain’s promise to do all he could to ensure the security of the field marshal.
After the meeting of Károlyi and Mackensen, the German general put his hand in his pocket and, in the name of the whole Hungarian people, he said in German language to Károlyi: “I had to do with a lot of people in my life, but I have never met such a man who was lacking so much all sense of honour as you.”
Getting to power, Mihály Károlyi even said to the people from the balcony of Hotel Astoria in Budapest: “It is only me who can save Hungary.” And Marxists and civilian radicals were beating their breasts saying: “We shall defend the country’s independence! Independence, freedom, equality!”. At the end of 1918, in Arad, Oszkár Jászi-Jakubovits, Minister of nationalities, was already looking the Romanian National Council in the eye. This ivory-tower scholar was speaking of a “Switzerland of the East”, sticking to his pacifism leading to a dead-end. However, Jászi was using all his influence so that there should be on one in the Károlyi government who is willing to defend the borders of the thousand-year Hungarian state. Jászi persuaded Károlyi to instruct the Hungarian mayors and public administrations in the Upper Hungary not to resist the Czech Legion pushing forward towards south.
Also such people appeared like the Lieutenant-Major Viktor Heltai, who was immediately promoted captain by the newspaper Egyenlőség (Equality). At the headquarters of the Károlyi government, Viktor Heltai offered to maintain public security. He was appointed town commander, but was soon replaced, because he was commissioned to organize detachments of mariners. Viktor Heltai then went to Pozsony with his sailors to beat off the invading Czech Legion. However, it turned out that they did not confront the Czech troops entering Bratislava. Instead, they pillaged, robbed, and committed other crimes. Heltai was arrested and an investigation was initiated against him. However, after the Communist takeover, he was released from prison. After the fall of the Hungarian Soviet Republic, Viktor Heltai was arrested again. Among other things, he was accused of having to do with the assassination of István Tisza. Viktor Heltai, however, escaped from confinement and departed to Vienna. The rural areas of Hungary are flooded from the capital by the cosmopolitan radicals and Marxists, who propagate the class hatred. With this, they also divert the attention of those who were the starters, the beneficiaries of the Great War, and the inciters of the takeover in Hungary. The neighbors who prepare for territory robbing are arming themselves with all their strength. However, there are no longer weapons or ammunition for the protection of the Hungarian borders, and, on the order of József Pogány-Schwartz, tens of thousand boxes of ammunition are hidden, because it is now kept for the Communist proletarian dictatorship to be proclaimed. The military officers and soldiers who are loyal to the historical Hungarian state are being disarmed and sent home systematically.
Budapest is filled with refugees from Transylvania, South and Upper Hungary. The cosmopolitan, anti-Hungarian press still propagates that President Wilson must be trusted. József Pogány-Schwartz increases the activity of the Military Council, mobilizes the Galileists, the Social Democrats, and thus they put under pressure Albert Bartha, who still detains the function of Minister of War in the Mihály Károlyi government at this time. They demanded that the Social Democrat Vilmos Böhm be the Minister of War of Hungary. Captain of the general staff Gyula Gömbös issued the slogan at this time: “Arms in hand! Out to the borders! Defend Greater Hungary!”
In parallel with the rapid fragmentation of the historical Hungarian state, the disarmament of the troops returning from the front was carried out. The performance of this complicated task was directed by Vilmos Böhm from 4 November1918. The Monarchy had plans to implement the post-war disarmament. However, they could no longer be implemented in the new situation. There were such units which broke up already in the front line or right after leaving it, and in other formations it happened only upon arrival at the Hungarian border. At the influence of the agents of József Pogány-Schwartz, the so-called soldiers’ councils were formed one after the other in these units. Due to coal and food shortages, there was a serious problem with the transport and supply of the soldiers returning from the front. The Ministry of War ordered the establishment of a National Guard, which, among other things, was responsible for defending the population, also against the robbing and looting soldiers.
The Polish, Czech, Croatian and Austrian units were marching in closed formations through the territory of Hungary. Their weapons and ammunition were transmitted in separate wagons. Many of the regiments, however, kept their weapons and, under the leadership of their officers, were returning in an exemplarily disciplined way to their original garrisons. The attitude of soldiers depended heavily on the officer corps and the spirit prevailing in that unit, and not so much on the nationality composition of the crew. Until the end of November 1918, a number of 700,000, and by mid-December 1,200,000 soldiers were discharged.
At the same time, the organization of the armed forces consisting of eight divisions allowed by the Belgrade Military Convention began. To accomplish this, the Ministry of War in Budapest ordered the retention of the five youngest contingents and also the retention of volunteers, paying them 30 crowns per day. By the end of November 1918, a number of 30,000 persons could be organized into troops. However, the general disciplinary situation has severely deteriorated. The situation was complicated by the debates on the Military Council and by the efforts of the military leadership to curb them. The main purpose of the Ministers of War Albert Bartha and Sándor Festetics was to stop the deprivation of the army and to eliminate the leftist incitation. The Social Democrats used the government crisis of January 1919 to acquire the ministry of war. The new Minister of War – Vilmos Böhm – asked the Colonel Aurél Stromfeld to be his state secretary. Stromfeld accepted this in the hope of facilitating the creation of a disciplined national army.
Stromfeld wanted to set up a division of operations to put an end to the compromising retreat and to prevent the unlawful seizure of further Hungarian territories through armed resistance. He wished to create the army on a voluntary basis. In a very short time, Stromfeld prepared the order regulating the organization of the new army, in the framework of which a voluntary army of 6 infantry divisions would have been formed. A separate part of it was the Danube Guard and the Székely Division in its original organization. According to the territorial principle, the voluntary candidates have been assigned to the branches of service in which they were serving during the war. A number of 3000 officers and nearly 10,000 noncommissioned officers would have belonged to the planned divisions. In this way, a strong army consisting of 70,000 soldiers could have protected the still legally valid borders of the historical Hungary.
Aurél Stromfeld designed professionally in military terms, but was not able to achieve his purpose. After 4 weeks of recruiting, only 5000 people were enrolled. Stromfeld knew that this failure occurred not for military, but for political reasons, and so he resigned from his mandate of state secretary. However, as a Hungarian patriot, he gave in to the request of the Social Democrats and continued his efforts to set up the army.
Hungary changed its form of state in November 1918. This could not have happened without the world strategic goals of the Grand Orient freemasons. The purpose of the Grand Orient freemasons was to transform Hungary into a Masonic, cosmopolitan, liberal, atheistic state, modeled after the French state. Like the French Republic was for a hundred years then. On the one hundredth anniversary of the French Revolution, the aim was formulated in Paris, according to which the kingdoms should be eliminated in Europe and republics should be created instead of them, which should be gradually unified and a united European Republic should be created, which would be a member of a universal Masonic World Republic.
The Hungarian People’s Republic was proclaimed on 16 November 1918. By this, they sought to achieve the dissolution of the more than 900 years old Kingdom of Hungary. On 4 November 1918, Jenő Benda gave a lecture in the Demokratia Lodge, in which he formally suggested that Freemasonry should stand beside the creation of the republican form of state. On November 11 1918, the Freemasons coming from 12 different Masonic lodges have adopted the plan of the republic. From these lodges, the Galilei and Sas (Eagle) Lodges still operate in the framework of the Grand Lodge of the János order, and the Martinovics Lodge under the supervision of the Grand Orient Grand Lodge. Several radical Masons from the Martinovics Lodge participated in the Károlyi government. They were the ones who persuaded the government to proclaim the People’s Republic.
According to the declaration of the Demokratia Lodge, the kingdom, as a form of state, is the cause of all evil and evil, and that is why the form os state of the republic is needed. In Scandinavia, the Benelux states and Great Britain, where the ruling dynasties are also Freemasons, the kingdom is no longer considered the cause of all evils. The Demokratia Lodge initiated the change of the form of state without consulting the people. It set out eight precise plans, the final point of which is to establish a European Republican Confederation. The International Freemasonry today calls for the creation of the United States of Europe.
The change of the form of state was closely related with the disarmament of the army returning from the front. The Hungarian soldiers and officers took the oath on the kingdom and on King Charles IV. The Károlyi government, which was a republican one, did not get authorization on legal elections. A violent minority formed a government without democratic legitimacy. Most of the returning soldiers did not recognize this illegitimate government and they could have confronted it with arm in hand. This is why it was urgent for the Károlyi government to dissolve the divisions returning from the front, and to replace them with a new army loyal to him. The condition that there was not yet a peace treaty, but only an armistice agreement, accelerated the disintegration of the army.
The negotiating positions of a state that has no army in such a critical situation are almost completely eliminated. In words, the Freemasonry in Hungary wanted to preserve the territorial integrity of the country, but it actually helped the breaking up of Hungary by overthrowing the historical Hungarian state with a coup and illegitimately proclaiming the Republic without a referendum, in a historically inopportune time.
The consequences of the Trianon Peace Dictate: A mutilated country and the Trianon Psychosis, affecting also the successor states even today
The First World War ended in the way that the decision-makers of the power over the states entered the United States into the war. However, the American army already did not have to win in huge battles. The anticipated bloody battles, which would have demanded additional great sacrifices, did not take place. Nevertheless, the armies did not capitulate, but, under ceasefire conventions, they returned to their countries with arms in hand, since they all fought on hostile land.
Although American President Wilson proclaimed the eternal peace, in which not dictates, but a democratic referendum will decide on border disputes, and on the peace talks not winners and losers, but equal nations will agree with each other, on the basis of the right of peoples to self-determination.
Wilson wanted a lasting peace in Europe, and the Austro–Hungarian Monarchy was not originally intended to be cut apart, but transformed into a federative state. Hungary, with a territory of more than 200,000 km2 would have been a member of this federative state. The 57,800 km2 large Transylvania would have been an independent country either. And, as an autonomous part of Hungary, the Upper Hungary would have belonged to the envisaged Central European State Federation, together with the historical areas of the Czech Republic.
However, the American President, exposed to the power over the states, did not succeed either in reaching that the peoples of the Monarchy could manifest their will in a referendum. Wilson refused his previous position and opposed the right to self-determination. The power elite above the states continued to control the peace talks going on under French leadership. The Pan-Slavic lobby operating in Paris, which was initially financed mainly by Russia, and, after the Bolshevik takeover, Belgrade and Bucharest took over the payment of corruption money, continued to activate effectively. At the end of the war, also Prague joined this job, when Masaryk and Beneš took over the government. Ferenc Fejtő writes that, Masaryk, like Beneš, who joined him later, was a member of Freemasonry, and this relationship brought great benefits to the two men.
His masonic friends and sympathizers opened the doors of the most important universities, public administrations, influential salons in front of him. Ferenc Fejtő remarks about the interaction of the Freemasons and Masaryk: “The Austro–Hungarian Monarchy was destroyed by the Austrian-hatred that became dominant in France and Great Britain, the forefront fighters of which were the Masons who have been waiting for a long time for the reckoning with their clerical main enemies. The Austrian-hatred skillfully exploited the autonomist and separatist movements within the Monarchy by helping them to emerge. This feeling was not the monopoly of Freemasons, nor did they bear the responsibility alone for transforming the classic war into an ideological war.
On 11 February 1918, President Wilson still says that he wants to create a world order that rests on the principle of law and truth, and not on selfishness. No one should be excluded from the negotiations. Wilson also states that peoples and provinces cannot be annexed from a supreme power to the other supreme power, as if they were merely assets. Furthermore, all territorial arrangements should be carried out only in the interest of the populations concerned.
However, André Lebey, the Secretary of the Council of the French Grand Orient Masonic Grand Lodge puts it differently. Without the definitive defeat of the Central Powers, neither human rights nor the rights of peoples may exist. He adds to it that “all nationalities, which are now oppressed by the political and administrative organization of the Habsburg Empire, must be liberated or unified into states created by the above mentioned nationalities through national referendum.” Lebey therefore accepted Masaryk’s position and not Wilson’s.
Masaryk referred to the resolutions of the Masonic Congress held in Paris, when he set out his own vision against the also Masonic concepts of President Wilson. The President of the United States obeyed in a servile way the secret elite above him, and, giving up his original idea, executed the decisions of the Masonic Congress. Colonel Edward Mandel House was the delegate of the London secret elite near Wilson.
British historians Gerry Docherty and Jim Macgregor write in their work titled Hidden History – The Secret Origins of the First World War that “House directed the President in all aspects of foreign and domestic politics. He chose the members of his government, and he brought the first political decisions of his new administration. He was the number one intermediary between the President and Wall Street supporters. The President was not left to himself with his own ideas. The Government of America got step-by-step under the overwhelming power of investor bankers closely related to the Rothschilds.”
The Central Powers were still entrusted to the Wilson principles when they made their ceasefire offer, but in Versailles the Wilsonism was no longer valid. Together with the principle of self-determination, they denied ethnic and historical principles, replacing them with the secret contracts with the successor states and the strategic considerations serving their interests.
The secret elite over the states could no longer weaken Germany, because then it would become unable to repay to the war-starting money rule elite the loans that were taken over during the war and the reparations forced onto it in the Paris peace treaty. Germany was held responsible for the starting of the Great War, thus justifying the burden forced onto it by the unnegotiated peace dictate.
When the peace-makers reached this goal, they transformed the anti-German attitude into an anti-Austria and then into an anti-Hungarian attitude. In the Versailles period, already the anti-Hungarian passions dominated. The provinces of the Habsburg Monarchy belonging to Austria were all separated, only Austria proper was left of them. However, the historical Kingdom of Hungary remained in principle intact and had a relatively large territory. The power over the states and its agents in Versailles paid their new allies with territories of Hungary, the Masaryks, the Benešes, the Brătianus and the Pasices. All of them were occasion-made thieves, whose will to annex greater and greater Hungarian territories grew like the appetite grows during eating.
The total contempt of the international law is shown by the fact that they cut out an area of 5000 km2 from the historical Hungarian state for the also loser Austria. The Hungarian counties neighbouring Austria were cut into two, although not Austrians were living in these territories, but the Swabians settled there after the Turkish occupation and indigenous Hungarians.
Germany was not only imposed a reparation of an unpayable size on, but was also obliged to deny its historical and public law traditions. A Germany deprived of its historical and cultural heritage, which refuses its national identity, is unviable. It was proved by the extremely liberalized and decadent Weimar Republic. Belgian historian Léon Degrelle stated about Hungary that “Hungary was crucified in the Versailles peace talks not because its sins but because its faith (the veracity of its faith, its loyalty to God), and thus became a victim of the hatred and greed of the blinded Freemasonry.”
Georges Clemenceau has done everything to attain that the largest territory from Hungary (more than it was left to Hungary) be attached to Romania. But the same Clemenceau argued that he considers the Romanians to be most sinful among the nations that participated in the World War. In October 1918, he said: “Among the hyenas of war, the Romanians are the vilest. They were allies of France, and, nevertheless, they acted for two years as though they belonged to the Germans. They grabbed millions from grains and crude oil sold to the enemy. (…) I will never agree to ever renew the treaties we have made with them on the condition that they are willing to fight on the side France.” Well, this Clemenceau contributed to the fact that Romania, which at the beginning of the war was a country with a territory of 137 000 km2, has become a multi-ethnic empire of 295 000 km2.
Hungary was much harmed by Robert William Seton-Watson and Wickham Steed, who were friends of the Hungarians at first, but, when the secret elite over the states and the international Freemasonry belonging to its network threatened Hungary as a state, these two Englishmen became sharply anti-Hungarians and even Hungarian-haters. These amateur experts regularly received bribery money, mainly from the Romanians and the Serbs, but later even from the Czechs.
In the peace agreements around Paris and the peace dictate in Trianon, the agents of organized private power over the states refused to comply with the principles and norms of the European Peace System stipulated in Westphalia. The secret elite over the states was driven by the unlimited and selfish private interest, and gave priority to the war profit against the lives of the lives of young people representing the best of Europe. From 1916 on, the war had to be continued in essence so that the superrich money-oligarchs could gain astronomical profit for another two years to satisfy their greedy enrichment needs.
The peace-makers of the organized private power over the states have opposed the international law established in Europe in 2000 years. The culture of European, Greek, Roman, and Christian roots has integrated the spiritual values of humanism, Renaissance, Reformation and Enlightenment. This is how the European international law was created from the 1648 peace system in Westphalia. The starters and winners of the Great War have ignored this valid international law. This was manifested in the fact that the armistice seekers could not take part in the peace talks, only the winners. The German government requested an armistice on the basis of the 14 points of President Wilson. However, only the decisions taken unilaterally were communicated to the German delegation. This procedure against international law was continued against the two successor states of the Habsburg Monarchy, Austria and Hungary. Only the unilaterally taken dictate was communicated to the Hungarian peace delegation.
During the peace settlements around Paris, the world power over the states has replaced the international order based on Christian culture with the anarchy of unlimited lies. This world order of lying must be overthrown with the evidence-based truth. But the truth can only prevail if, besides as many Hungarians as possible, the European and world public opinion are acquainted with it. This requires a scientifically documented Trianon Museum and a digital version of it, available in the world languages. Documenting the truth is also a prerequisite that the unfairly stricken Hungarian nation should receive moral satisfaction. To do this, however, it is necessary to overcome that Trianon psychosis, which affects not only the inhabitants of the mutilated Hungary and the Hungarians who live in the disannexed parts of the country, but also the peoples of the successor states.
István Kocsis, Transylvanian historian and playwright, considers that the Romanian, Slovak, Serbian and Austrian Trianon psychoses cannot be explained with only rational arguments. The listed successor states gave evidence that they reinforce the image of the enemy needed for their own national identity by defaming the Hungarian nation and the Hungarian state. Not only rational political motives stand behind the anti-Hungarian attitude of the successor states. It is a proven fact that the societies of the successor states suffer of an identity crisis. Hatred can also arise from guilt remorse. The societies of the successor states have a bad conscience because they have overrobbed themselves. Due to the bad conscience of the usurper, the obsession to slander the Hungarians appeared in them. They must get rid of those who they had robbed, because if they still exist, they can reclaim what it had been taken away from them by violating all valid international legal principles.
Before the Great War, but also during the war and the peace talks, the successor states demanded the prevailing of the historical principle and of the linguistic-ethnic principle. The purpose of the Romanian national movements was to create the Romanian national unity. This was realized. However, owing to the power over the states and to the international Freemasonry implementing its decisions, Romania received more than twice as much territory in 1920 than the Romanian irredentists were expecting for.
The new country, grown to more than double, is not a nation-state, but a multinational empire, and only 65% of its inhabitants are Romanian. The Romanian politicians as well as their supporters in Paris and London knew that they must refuse the principle of national self-determination, and that it is therefore necessary to prevent the holding of referendums. And thus, on 1 December 1918, a Romanian mass meeting took place in Gyulafehérvár. This could not make valid decisions under international law. However, by this, Bucharest has achieved its goal of preventing the holding a referendum conforming with the international law neither in Transylvania, nor in the Partium, in the eastern part of the region beyond the river Tisza, or in Banat. The Hungarians in Transylvania also held a mass meeting in on 22 December 1918 in Kolozsvár, on which they took a stand on the issue that Transylvania and Eastern Hungary should continue to belong to the historical Hungarian state. However, nobody took this into account, although, despite the manifold obstacles, nearly one hundred thousand people participated in it.
The power over the states seeking to introduce the New World Order ordered Wilson, Clemenceau, Lloyd George, and House to take as much territory as possible from Hungary. The historical, ethnic and self-determination principles were replaced by the strategic principle. The London secret elite and the Masonic decision-makers in Paris provided, in this way, a greater area of Hungary than they left to the 11 million Hungarians, making reference to 2.9 million Hungarian citizens of Romanian ethnic origin.
Out of the referendum fought out literally in Sopron and its surroundings, the population was not asked about their will, because the competent parties knew from the projections that the unity of the majority of the historical Hungary would remain as the final result of such a referendum.
Romania was bound by a valid peace treaty to respect the borders. The separate peace concluded in Bucharest on 7 May 1918 would have allowed the discharging of the Romanian army. This was prevented by Ottokar Czernin, the foreign minister of the Habsburg Monarchy at that time, who was well-known to be an anti-Hungarian. Czernin convinced the inexperienced new sovereign that if the defeated Romania was not obliged to demobilize his army, then Romania could be a friendly state, fostering a good relationship with the Monarchy in the future. A “friendly state”, which, two years earlier, attacked his allies from behind! The Hungarian interests have suffered serious harm. It was also the consequence that, after the 1867 compromise, Hungary’s foreign and military affairs and finances were not managed by the Hungarians, according to the interests of the Hungarian nation.
If Czernin did not prevent the discharging of the Romanian army, it would not have happened that Bucharest sent invading troops towards Hungary on 10 November 1918. Where the Romanian army entered, the Hungarian public administration was immediately eliminated. This was contrary to the provisions of the Belgrade Convention. This convention prescribed that the Hungarian public administration should remain in place all over Hungary, inside and outside the demarcation line until the conclusion of the peace treaty. The Romanian Army acted as a conqueror in such a country which was not in a state of war with any of the states of the Entente.
Even the Romanian leaders themselves did not think that, after the First World War, Bucharest had received justly a larger territory from Hungary than was left for the 11 million Hungarians, making reference to the 2.9 million Romanians living in Hungary. This injustice is the reason for the state of mind which István Kocsis called “Trianon psychosis”. The fundamental goal of the Romanian state was to make this injustice justice by eliminating those who were the injured. They do not want to repair the nationalist selfishness with fair and just compromises. They want to make the injured parties disappear. If the very last injured of the injustice disappears, then the looted Romanian empire becomes legitimate.
On the basis of the Trianon psychosis, the massive moving and settling of the Romanians from the “Old Kingdom” onto the areas along the new Hungarian–Romanian border began. With reference to the “land reform”, most of the Hungarian land ownership was given into Romanian ownership. The Romanization of the former Hungarian towns has begun and it continues even in our days. Romanian churches have been built in almost all settlements of Szeklerland.
It is also part of the Trianon psychosis that the Romanians are dread of the possible justice. This anxiety hinders the prevalence of a genuine democracy in this multinational state. The transformation of the multinational Great Romania into a single-nation state has become a prime national goal. This, in turn, makes it impossible to reach other important Romanian national objectives. Such goals would be the creation of a state founded on the rule of law, raising standards of living and real modernization. If national selfishness is primary, then it is not possible to respect the principle of national and ethnic equivalence.
In the multiethnic Romania, plans are constantly being prepared to eliminate the living conditions of non-Romanians. The Hungarian institutions are taken away and they are handed over to the Romanians. They do not build a Romanian university in Kolozsvár, but convert the Hungarian university into a Romanian university. The same is the fate of the Hungarian Theatre of Kolozsvár. The ousting of the Hungarian language from secondary education is underway. The use of the Hungarian language in the administration was limited. The goal is that the Hungarians should melt into the Romanians or should leave the country. This makes the Trianon land robbery definitive. And, in Romanian interpretation, what is definitive, is also just.
The Trianon psychosis also afflicts the Hungarian society. The fragmentation of the historical Hungarian state was not necessary, and it was contrary to the self-determination right proclaimed by the Entente powers. If the London secret elite over the states did not force President Wilson to give up his own principles, a referendum could have taken place in Hungary. This would have been beneficial for Hungary on the basis of known facts and figures.
The historical Hungary would have remained intact not only if it had been allowed to keep the referendums, but if it had defended itself in a timely and organized manner and had sent its army returning from the front to defend the borders. This was prevented by internal forces seeking to liquidate the historical Hungary. Mihály Károlyi and his government, who have become the instrument of the liberal and cosmopolitan Freemasonry, undertook to eliminate the historical Hungarian Constitution and the public law system. The architects of the Paris Peace Treaties ignored Mihály Károlyi, but they could not have done the same with István Tisza, who returned to politics. The assassinated former Hungarian prime minister was respected also by the statesmen of the Entente, and they knew that in 1914 he was in the strongest opposition to the war.
The London General Staff of the power over the states, which was the designer, preparer, starter and conductor of the Great War, made a serious effort to force Germany into such a war that it wanted to avoid at all costs. For this secret elite, the murder in Sarajevo and the assassination of the heir to the throne Franz Ferdinand came at just the right moment. Between the two world wars, a partial correction of the Trianon peace dictate, which constitutes an international crime, has taken place. The new situation occurred with the two Viennese decisions, if it solidifies, could have alleviated the Trianon psychosis. On the contrary, the reality, however, is that the 1947 Peace Treaty of Paris reiterated everything that already proved to be a historical sin in 1920. In 1947, Hungary was broken up again and the also defeated Romania was again remunerated with enormous territories.
The new peace dictate has repeated the totally neglected the principle of ethnic and self-determination. It was more unfair than the Trianon peace dictate, because the minority protection provisions were omitted from its text. It was an unfair provision that the two artificial states, Yugoslavia and Czechoslovakia, were restored and rewarded with territories taken away from Hungary. Romania once again received 43.590 km2 of Hungarian territory, although Bucharest, as an ally of Germany, took part in World War II with a much greater armed force than Hungary.
As the result of the bargaining between Stalin and the Romanian leadership, on 13 March 1945, Bucharest took over again the public administration of Northern Transylvania. The Hungarian People’s Federation, which then managed Northern Transylvania, did not protest, because they thought that the administration, led by Petru Groza, would not want to abolish the statehood of Northern Transylvania, but proclaim it. The rivaling Romanian political forces subordinated everything to the goal to regain Northern Transylvania. According to the Romanian Fanariot way of thinking, if Stalin did not return Northern Transylvania to the government being in power at that time, that Romanian government should be replaced. That is why they agreed with the Soviet dictator that after the conclusion of the peace treaty the Soviet Army could remain in Northern Transylvania. Four years allowed the change of the characters in the Romanian political life. Stalin kept the 1945 agreement, and this further strengthened the Trianon psychosis of the Romanians, the essence of which is to get rid of Hungarians, either through violent assimilation or by inciting to emigration.
The Trianon of the whole Europe is in progress in our days
On the 100th anniversary of the Trianon Peace Dictate, reinforced with the Paris Peace Treaty in 1947, we must remind the public opinion of Europe and the world that in the post-war peace system it was only Hungary alone that was denied the application of all effective international legal principles. The dictate signed in the Grand Trianon Palace in Versailles did not take account, in the case of the Hungarian people, neither the historical, the ethnic-linguistic, nor the self-determination principles. After a hundred years, the successors of the Entente states should give an acceptable explanation for this.
Even the also loser Austria received such Hungarian territories which have always been part of the Kingdom of Hungary. Romania was not a member of the Austro–Hungarian Monarchy, but concluded a peace treaty with it. And then it violated this without any international legally acceptable reasons, and it tore away huge territories from the historical Hungarian state.
The international legal order, which is valid in the 21st century, permits changes of borders through peaceful negotiations. The United Nations Charter, the Helsinki Final Act, the Treaty of Lisbon of the European Union all allow for the peaceful alteration of borders in accordance with the existing international legal principles. The Hungarian people alone is interested in changing the current situation. In connection with the centenary year, the successors of the Entente must be reminded that it is their duty to correct the most blatant errors in the Peace Treaty of Versailles and the Treaty of Paris, which reiterated it. Romania was among the first to declare war to the Soviet Union. However, Bucharest has agreed with Moscow to renounce definitively to Bessarabia, i.e. Moldavia, a region largely inhabited by Romanians, and, in return, it can get again North Transylvania, inhabited by Hungarians.
The National Socialist Slovakia, separated from Czechoslovakia, participated in the Second World War as a satellite of Berlin, but still got out of the war as a winner. This was negotiated by the Mason Eduard Beneš from Stalin, in return for renouncing in favour of the Soviet Union to Sub-Carpathia, inhabited also by Hungarians, which belonged to Hungary for a thousand years. South Hungary, also called Vajdaság, was once again annexed to the reformed Yugoslavia, which militarily unified the Southern Slavs. Since the national mutilation committed in Trianon, the number of Hungarian-speaking populations living in areas disannexed from the historical Hungarian state has halved, while the number of the majority population of the successor states has steadily and continuously increased.
The current successors of the Entente states should correct the parts of the Versailles and Paris peace treaties that violate international law, according to a subsequently chosen international legal principle. According to the European values and principles of law valid in our century, Hungary must receive moral satisfaction and revision.
First of all, a wide-range territorial autonomy must be ensured for the Hungarian minorities, along the same pattern of the territorial autonomies already existing in the European Union. This should be augmented with a wide-range cultural autonomy, in the diaspora regions and mixed-population areas. The centenary year provides an opportunity to remind the competent persons of the need to introduce a proportional and full-spectrum school system of Hungarian teaching language. This means two Hungarian language universities in Slovakia, in Kassa and Pozsony. In Romania, the Bolyai University in Kolozsvár should be given back, and a state-funded Hungarian university should be established in Nagyvárad, Kolozsvár, Csíkszereda and Temesvár. In Serbia there would also be a need for a state-funded Hungarian university in Újvidék, and in Sub-Carpathia, annexed to Ukraine, in Beregszász.
In the mixed population areas of 15% Hungarian inhabitants, the teaching of the Hungarian language must also be made compulsory in the majority schools. As the French-Swiss child living in Geneva learns German, and the German-speaking child in Bern-Zürich is studying French, and the Italian-speaking child in Lugano learns German and French, so should learn the Hungarian language in the Slovak, Romanian, Serbian, and Ukrainian schools as well, at least on a basic level.
Relations based on equality in right and the coordination also make it possible for Transylvania to become a region with a high degree of self-determination within the European Union, possibly an EU member state, according to the decision of the voters living there. The possibilities of this were raised primarily by Romanian social scientists and politicians. This may be advantageous for indigenous Hungarians and Székely-Hungarians living in Transylvania, since it would strengthen their possibilities to enforce their interests.
The Carpathian Basin, the geographical and geopolitical home, formed by nature, of the historical Hungary and the millennial Kingdom of Hungary is composed of parts complementing organically each other. Therefore, the peoples living in the Carpathian Basin would be naturally living in a state structure that encompasses the entire territory of the former historical Hungary. This state formation within the European Union, which can be called Danube-Carpathian Confederacy, in cooperation with the Visegrád Four, would allow the peoples of the Carpathian Basin to have an optimum coexistence based on full equality.
Even lessened, the Hungarian is still the largest in the community of peoples living in the Carpathian Basin. Therefore, the creation of the Duna-Carpathian Confederacy would also facilitate the strengthening of the Hungarian nation. The Danube-Carpathian Confederacy would be such a confederation of states in which self-determination and the practice of power would be realized according to the principles, proved to be durable, of the state model of the Hungarian Holy Crown.
The centenary also provides an opportunity to stop the forced assimilation of Hungarians living in minority in the successor states. The Hungarian population is decreasing at an accelerated rate in the country parts separated from Hungary. One of the reasons for this is mass emigration, the other is the language chauvinism and forced assimilation raised to the rank of state politics. The coexistence based on mutual respect requires a mutually accepted and taught history, based on scientific research. In the case of Romania, it is necessary to abandon the Daco-Roman myth, the heroic national romanticism of the Romanians. Both were forced by the Romanian national communism.
Lucian Boia, professor at the University of Bucharest, admitted that Romania had no historical right to Transylvania, in contrast with Bessarabia and Bukovina. According to Boia, the Transylvanian Romanians would have been more pleased with a wide-ranging autonomy, either in the Habsburg Monarchy transformed into a federative state or as part of the Old Kingdom of Romania. The Transylvanian autonomy could not have been established, because Hungary had left the Austro-Hungarian Monarchy in the autumn of 1918. For the Transylvanian Romanians, Vienna may have been even more attractive than Bucharest, but if they had to choose between Budapest and Bucharest, the Romanian capital had a clearly better chance.
Lucian Boia writes about Romanian majority in Transylvania, but admits that the number of Hungarians and Saxons in towns and their influence was greater. The Bucharest historian does not consider the Romanian mass meeting held on 1 December 1918 in Gyulafehérvár to be equivalent with a referendum. This event was not attended by the Hungarians and the Saxons, and the meeting took place when the Romanian Army already marched in. Lucian Boia attributes to the fortunate historical situation that Transylvania and Bessarabia and even Bukovina could become part of the Great Romania between the two world wars.
The period favourable for the Romanian expansion has begun already before the First World War. In the case of Romania, the First World War provided new opportunities. The liberal part of the Romanian leadership has given precedence to the conquest of Transylvania, as opposed to the acquisition of Bessarabia. These liberal Romanian politicians stood beside the Entente. In connection with the Trianon Peace Treaty, Professor Boia made an important statement for the Hungarians, namely that Romania had no historical right to Transylvania. Transylvania never formed part of the Romanian principalities.
“Germany, following its defeat of the Second World War, took responsibility also for the First World War, and renounced to all claims. Hungary remains the only protester, considering Trianon to be an outrageous injustice to the present day.”, states Boia, adding: “ This series of treaties (the treaty system of Versailles as a whole) is the birth certificate of today’s Europe.” According to Boia, the territorial changes that occurred following the collapse of the Communist block did not essentially change the map of Europe as compared to the settlement after the First World War.
The Romanian nation-state created after World War II became more homogeneous, and therefore the justification for its existence is less controversial today than in 1918. The Bucharest historian here disregards the fact that, under the applicable international legislation, in 1920 and 1947 could have been possible to correct the blatant injustices, even in the framework of the new international relations. Boia acknowledges that, in the successor states created by the Versailles Peace System, the minorities enjoyed no collective rights anywhere. The Little Entente states have adapted the model of the French-type political nation. He also notes that the nation state automatically assimilates, and that this assimilation was complemented by the violent programme of ethnic and cultural homogenization during the Second World War and later in the Communist era.
In the peace treaties after the First and Second World War, Romania has undertaken a number of specific commitments to guarantee the individual and collective freedoms of its new, non-Romanian-speaking citizens that got under its authority following the border-change. These obligations were not implemented by Bucharest, but Romania should be required to do it afterwards. From the Peace Treaty of Versailles and Paris, it is observed that Transylvania, the Partium, the area beyond the river Tisza and the Banat belong to the Romanian state, but not the other commitments of Romania regarding the collective rights of minorities. One of the provisions of the Versailles peace settlement is sacred and inviolable and the other provision is a paper rag. Unfortunately, the Paris peace-makers did not provide for the establishment of an international control mechanism that could have guaranteed compliance with the peace treaties as a whole.
On the occasion of the centenary, it should be stated that the current Romanian, Slovak and Serbian management layer had not been given the right, together with the territories annexed to them from the mutilated historical Hungary, to Romanize or Slovakize the Hungarians given under their authority without asking them whether they want or not to be minorities in a conquering country. Hungarians living in Romania and in other successor states will be an integral part of the Hungarian nation even after a hundred years, despite the arbitrary change of political borders.
The nationalist Romania, but also the Romanian national communism, discriminated its Hungarian-speaking citizens. The Communist dictatorship ordered the arbitrary integration of the Hungarian Bolyai University in Kolozsvár into the Romanian University Babeş. This dictatorial state act could only be corrected by a different, but already democratic state act. The restoration of the independent and teaching fully in Hungarian, state-funded Bolyai University could be the first step in overcoming the still existing adverse consequences of Trianon in Romania. The second step is to return the Hungarian and Hungarian church properties as soon as possible. The third is the guarantee of the territorial autonomy of Szeklerland.
In Prague and Bratislava, the so-called Beneš decrees which are still in force and are highly disadvantageous for the Hungarian-speaking population must be deleted without delay. The time has come for the European Union to overcome the survival of the delusion of collective guilt and the discriminatory measures and their legal consequences that have struck the Hungarians unilaterally. What we, Europeans, have experienced at the beginning of the 21st century as a so-called refugee crisis is in fact the continuation of the Great War started in 1914. In this period of the war, the process accelerated which could lead to the annihilation of the indigenous peoples of white species living in Europe. Together with their descendants, the hundreds of thousands of people from the Middle East and Africa flocking to Europe, today represent between 6 and 7% of the population of our continent and their number has already exceeded 30 million. The majority of migrants are followers of Islam, which is not a religion in the European sense. It is a medieval religious-political ideology designed to conquer the world and introduce the Islamic world order.
The power elite over the states that started the Great War has entered into an alliance with the Islam and, through its Masonic networks, helps it to conquer our continent. The international Freemasonry has a leading role in paralyzing the resistance of indigenous Europeans. According to Academician Miklós Maróth, orientalist, “The vital instinct either will rise in Europe or Europe will die. Only these two options are available. With the current instruments, it is not possible to fight a winning battle against terrorists who permit everything for themselves.”
In the second decade of the twentieth century, we are witnessing that the radical Islam has been successful in crushing Europe’s indigenous peoples and nation-states. The global elite over the states is imposing the delusion that the integration and assimilation of millions of illegal immigrants is possible. The global elite wants to finalize its hegemony over Europe by changing the genetic composition of its population. Radical Muslims who are coming together with the migrants openly announce that they have not come to be integrated, but to Islamize Europe. If their numbers reach critical greatness, they will take over the power in Europe.
The global elite has teamed up with the super-rich Arab oil oligarchs. They finance the Islamization of Europe and build the mosques, which are converted into the local centres of Islamic culture. Europe was made great by the Greek-Roman high culture and the morality rooted in Christianity with the help of the scientific thinking developed here. The enormous scientific, technical and artistic performance of the peoples of Europe required the Renaissance, the Enlightenment, the Reformation, the classical liberalism, the human and political freedoms and the prevailing of the rule of law. Without these, Europe could not have become the centre of the world culture in the 19th and 20th century.
Millions of people dispatched and transported in Europe by the global elite, the majority of which are followers of the Islam, consider the countries in which they are settled as their own. According to their faith, the whole Earth was created by Allah primarily for the Muslims who follow him, therefore the invading migrants expropriate the values created by Europeans with hard work. They loudly proclaim that the richness of Europe rightly belongs to them, for it also exists from the will of Allah.
The scientific thinking and the Christian morality propagating the equality of all humans have raised together Europe high. Islam has not broken away from the Middle Ages, and thus has no intellectual resources such as Europe that grew up on the Christian culture. When Muslims, who propagate religious intolerance, take control of Europe, they are also paralyzing the scientific thinking based on freedom of thought. By getting under Islamic domination, Europe will no longer be able to produce the goods for which the Muslim millions have come and still come to Europe to acquire and expropriate them without compensation. Not the Muslims who conquer Europe are rising to the European high-culture, but the indigenous peoples descend to the level of violent immigrants who are invading Europe.
The global elite helps the political Islam to get into power because this consolidates its world order of money rule. The single-pole world order of the global elite is the enforcer of the organized private power, and represents a selfish private interest that knows no restraints. However, the democratically elected legitimate leaders of the nation-states, representing the public power, are obliged to serve the public interest and the common good.
The Islam is an ally of the global power over the states because, according to its religious-political ideology, it itself denies the nation-states. It is only important for the Islam that in a world without nation-states all people should live according to the rules of Islamic culture and religion. The global elite wants a single-pole money rule world order, in which there is a single power center. In this Single World Order, only its private money system, the world trade and world economy being under his hegemony operates with a world army and a synchretic world religion. In this world order, a colour-skinned population created by blending of races from the peoples of our Earth will live. There will no longer be nations based on white species, nation-states, cultures based on scientific knowledge and Christian moral. There is nothing and no one who could question the domination of the money rule world elite.
The power elite over the states has embarked on a change of era in the world history by starting the Great War in 1914. At that time, they wanted to get rid of not only the Hohenzollerns, Romanovs, Habsburgs and ottomans, but wanted to create in the place of the Austro–Hungarian Monarchy a federation of small states depending on them. In turn, they paid the war services of the newly established vassal states with the territories of Hungary.
The domestic radical and cosmopolitan forces, the bases of which were formed by the groups of interest holding in hand the management of financial and economic life, also crucially contributed to the fragmentation of Hungary. These groups of liberal and Marxist spirituality wanted to acquire also the political power beside their economic and cultural power. Therefore, they did everything in order to overthrow the state order of the Kingdom of Hungary. The decisive step for this goal was the disarming of the 1,200,000 member Hungarian army returning from the front. The power over the states has found effective allies in the radical, liberal and socialist groups seeking to acquire political power.
In our days, the global elite seeks to liquidate the democratic nation-states representing public power in Europe. We can see this as a repetition of the Trianon tragedy in Hungary at a European level. It is remarkable what Barbara Lerner Spectre said about this. The American-born Spectre, who had previously lived in Israel with his husband, has been leading a state-funded institute in Sweden since 2017, the main task of which is promoting multiculturalism and making Europe a mixed-race and blended-culture continent.
Spectre does not attribute the critical phenomena against the Jews living in Europe to the Israel-hating Muslim prejudices. In her opinion, the reason for the critical setting is the leadership that the Jews play in spreading multiculturalism. “I think”, she says, “anti-Semitism has been reborn, because so far Europe has not learned how to be multicultural. I think that we shall also be part of this transformational labour, which must come into being. Europe will no longer be composed of such monolithic societies as it did in the last century. The Jews will be at the heart of this process. Europe stands in front of a tremendous transformation. Now it is passing into the multicultural mode. The Jews will be attacked because of their leading role. But without this leadership and transformation, Europe will not be able to survive.”
Those who want to force a mixed population and cultures that are radically different from each other onto Europe, must take note that many other countries are working well with a dominant culture recognized by all. The real challenge that Europe has to face is how to survive the multiculturalism forced onto it by the global elite over the history-forming states and by its power network, which is built into the states, the Deep State.
The neo-conservative representatives of the cultural Marxism at the service of the money rule world elite have reached that many indigenous ethnic groups in Europe are already indifferent to their own ethnic roots. These peoples have already put up with the fact that their clinging adherence to their identity is considered to be a repented racism, which is the harmful inheritance that has remained from colonization and for which they must feel guilt. However, the hypocritical tolerance to the conquering, intolerant invasion of migrants is intolerance itself. And a vassal people, which has lost its national identity is doomed to destruction. But we, Hungarians, together with our fellow European nations, want to live, preserving our homeland and our Christian culture.
If you agree with the preparation of this educational documentary film on Trianon and are in a position to make material sacrifices for this purpose, I would ask you, on behalf of the National Trianon Society, chaired by Dr. Janos Drabik, to transfer your material support to the IBAN: HU50-11600006-00000000-81148356 bank account number.
Thank you very much indeed for your kind and most needed help.
Presidency of the National Trianon Society